In real estate, the mantra is often "location, location, location." But when it comes to carbon credit projects, is location really that critical? The answer is nuanced—it depends. Climate change is a global issue, and therefore, the location of a project doesn't inherently affect its ability to mitigate climate change. What truly matters when choosing carbon projects are three key factors: quality, cost, and story. While location influences these factors, it doesn’t need to be the guiding principle for buyers. Let's delve into how location impacts these aspects and how to consider location in your decision-making process.

Quality: The Intricate Link Between Project Location and Integrity

The quality of a carbon credit project is deeply intertwined with its location. The regulatory environment, socioeconomic context, and even the ecological landscape where a project is implemented can significantly affect its additionality (the degree to which the project delivers emissions reductions that wouldn’t have happened without carbon market financing) and overall integrity.

For example, certain activities required by law in some countries might not qualify as additional since they would occur regardless of carbon financing. Similarly, a country with weaker social protections might allow projects to proceed without obtaining Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC) from local communities, compromising the ethical integrity of the project. In some regions, governments might even count emissions reductions from carbon projects toward their national targets, leading to the risk of double-counting. The local environment also plays a critical role—a reforestation project in an arid region, for example, is less likely to succeed if it's planting species suited to more humid climates.

These examples show that while location can impact project quality, understanding these implications requires deep due diligence. Evaluating a project’s quality means looking beyond the ecological landscape to consider its financial, political, regulatory, and social contexts. For buyers without the resources to conduct such thorough research, there’s no need to worry—at CNaught, we handle this due diligence for you, ensuring that every project we select meets the highest standards of integrity and impact. Our portfolio approach diversifies project location, further minimizing any geographic risks.

Cost: The Geographical Influence on Carbon Credit Prices

Location can also influence the cost of carbon credits, as operational expenses and the supply of credits can vary widely across different regions. For instance, conserving land in the United States is often far more expensive than in the Global South, where land costs are lower. Similarly, the availability of materials and infrastructure necessary for project implementation can differ by country, affecting overall project costs.

However, location is just one of many factors influencing a carbon credit’s price. The type of project, its scale, quality, and market demand also play significant roles. Therefore, filtering projects by location is not necessarily the most effective strategy for controlling costs. Instead, a portfolio approach is more beneficial, allowing buyers to balance higher-cost projects with more affordable ones, ultimately achieving a price point that fits their budget.

Story: How Location is Not the Only Way to Align Investments with Brand Values

Many buyers want to tell the story of their investment in carbon projects, highlighting the impact it has beyond carbon and how it aligns with their company's mission or brand. This sometimes involves purchasing credits from projects near their operations, benefiting the local community and environment. However, this can be costly and challenging to implement. Buyers prioritizing location-based storytelling often face higher costs and those with restricted budgets end up compromising on quality. Fortunately, there are other ways to align carbon investments with brand values and tell a compelling story.

Purchasing carbon credits from projects worldwide helps distribute the impact of investments more equitably. While industrialized nations have caused the majority of the emissions that have led to climate change, the Global South is where the impacts of climate change have been the most severe. Moreover, location-based storytelling often over simplifies the rich impacts carbon projects can have. Many carbon projects contribute to the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals and offer "beyond carbon" benefits, such as creating sustainable livelihoods, building schools, increasing clean energy capacity, or supporting biodiversity and clean water. By focusing on these additional impacts, buyers can invest in projects that align with their mission, regardless of location. Investing in a portfolio of projects with varying locations and beyond-carbon benefits allows buyers to craft a richer narrative about the diversity of their investment impacts while also managing costs and minimizing risk.

******

While location can influence the quality, cost, and story of a carbon credit, it doesn’t need to guide your purchasing decisions. At CNaught, we take the guesswork out of this process by accounting for the impact of location when selecting projects and building portfolios. We ensure that the projects we recommend are of the highest quality and align with your budget and strategic goals. Plus, we provide you with the tools to tell a compelling story about your carbon investments and how they align with your company’s mission.

Let us navigate the complexities of location to help you make the most impactful and cost-effective carbon credit purchases. Schedule time with us here.